Fahrwerk Theorie | Posts 32+

Ah... I know what my MR2 was like (when it was still in stock condition), and I know what it's like now. That's enough for me...

Okay, there are also a few other things that have been done...

@Forenheini

Interesting calculation.


I agree, especially because there's a wild (and incorrect) mixing of dynamics and statics here.

=>Trash can!

Trash can!Try to do better... or simply say what you don't like or where you think there's a mistake; that would be more skillful. I'm open to constructive criticism; nobody is perfect; but you'd better keep that kind of stuff to yourself, it doesn't make friends.

I am open to constructive criticism, nobody is perfect; but you should probably keep comments like that to yourself, it doesn't make friends .

Okay, boss, my criticism was constructive. If you're going to copy physics formulas from somewhere, at least read up on what they're used for.

You cannot relate a dynamically varying axle load, without any reference to mass, to what is, in a simplified way, a torque.
Since you have a dynamic mass system here, you need to perform calculations in a coordinate system and split the individual movements into the x, y, and z directions.

The Golf3 Syncro was available with a 90hp 1Z engine and basic CL trim. I was considering buying one, but the basic CL trim (despite the addition of electric front windows) and the bright red standard color were a deterrent for me.

Otherwise, why don't you try the Eibach Prokit ?
Or, instead, you could invest in a chip and have the torque curve adjusted so that there's enough torque for starting, but the maximum torque is delayed until, for example, 2,200 RPM to benefit the drive system.

I am open to constructive criticism; nobody is perfect; but you should probably keep comments like that to yourself, it doesn't make friends .

Okay, boss, my criticism was constructive. Good one, lion, if something was meant for the trash, it was the nonsense you were talking about. It starts with you calling me 'boss' and acting foolish...

If you're already copying physics formulas from somewhere, then first read up on what they are used for.

You cannot relate a dynamically varying axle load, without any reference to mass, to what is, in a simplified way, a torque.
Since you have a dynamic mass system here, you need to perform calculations in a coordinate system and split the individual movements into x, y, and z directions. Aha, as I said, try to do it better first, but I don't think you'll understand.

Why do you think I have no sense of spatial orientation ? What would your solution look like ? Did I say anywhere that this is a trivial solution, or didn't I say more that it's a rough calculation ? I also pointed out that the movements of the vehicle's center of gravity (i.e., the center of mass) need to be taken into account. However, for a first general statement, this is irrelevant. And of course, all of this can be considered quasi-statically, since the processes in between don't play a role for a first rough estimate.

I haven't heard such utter nonsense in a long time.

Sometimes, it's best to follow the old saying: it's better to stay silent if you don't have any idea what you're talking about. @Admin/Mods: Sorry, I don't want to cause any trouble here; it's just the truth.

Quote:

the maximum torque, but for the benefit of the drive systems, for example, is only achieved at 2-2200 rpm.

Then I would never use that tuning .

Because, except in 5th gear, I never reach those high RPMs that are typical of gasoline engines .

For me, seeing 2000 people in a city is a signal that I might be able to find someone I'm interested in.

(Yes, I know it's not an Actros, but I'm driving it like one.)

m;

I'm sorry, folks, but I'd like to support Forumheini a little (just technically).

I also don't like the tone of the last comments from both sides, but it's mainly about the technical explanation. And I think that 'Forenheini' has presented a very simplified, but manageable and informative calculation. For a rough estimate ('PI*Daumen Rechnung'), it's sufficient. It makes the trend and forecast visible.
Sure, you could also publish a study on this topic here. However, a more accurate, and therefore much more complex, calculation would not be as plausible or easy to understand.

I am not trying to attack anyone or gain/lose friends, but rather I want to appeal to everyone's sense of reason and ask them to respect each other.

Best regards, Georg.