Question regarding correlation: 10Cent, Jerk, Pump characteristic curve

Hi

I've noticed a slight vibration in my 1Z engine now.

Nevertheless, I once connected a 680 Ohm resistor to the ESP.
As a result, the amount of free energy has decreased from 5 to 3.8 mg.

Now, to the questions:

If I start with the 10C switched on, there will be no emergency shutdown.
Nevertheless, I am 1.17 times faster in the DZ test (9.3 seconds to 7.9 seconds).

Once, you had a "ruckeln" with tuning, which was also stronger than without, as expected.

Could it be that a 5 mg LL (lean mixture) setting is already very aggressive (perhaps the previous owner has already heavily adjusted the pump curve for the owner), and that with tuning, I can only get close to the 90-series power figures?
And that is why the 10C is not acknowledged by the EDC with a shutdown.

(The colleague's ASV reading was 4.4 mg without Box 4, and 1.4 mg with Box 4)

I am particularly bothered by the performance increase, even with (according to the Ruckel article) a series-like 3.8 mg LL dosage.

Is there anything against first (without tuning) bringing the LL-value to 4 mg (adjustment according to (Rough article) and then test the 10C thing again.

Moving the parameter via VAGCOM should always be reversible (simply enter the old value again) ????

Thank you for the tips.
m;

dieselmartin wrote:

What if, instead of tuning, we first aim for an LL-value of 4 mg? (Adjustment according to...) (Rough article) and then test the 10C thing again. Moving the parameter via VAGCOM should always be reversible (simply enter the old value again) ????

Hi Martin,

IMO, there's nothing against it -> Try it out , although the risk of damage is practically zero here.