@all: Mark topics as "important"

Hi.

I have just changed the priority of 2 threads from "important" to "normal," regarding which I disagree with the authors' assessment of their importance to the forum.

My request: Even if the issues are "urgent" on a personal level, please only include them in the title.
Otherwise, over time, more and more topics accumulate at the top of the overview, which were once at some point earlier important to the author, but are now long forgotten, and the administrator or moderators can repeatedly "verschandeln up".

IMO, only topics that are of fundamental importance to all (or the majority of) forum participants should be classified as "important."

Hi Ulf,

That's exactly what I was going to suggest later, because it's actually quite confusing, as it scrambles the order.

Thank you!

Best regards,

Jan.

Can one revert the author priority level back to a lower level? If so, where and how? After I fixed the problem on my end, I also searched for a way to prevent it from happening again, but unfortunately, I couldn't find a solution.

Regards,

Tom.

Okay, when I find the time ( what is that?), I will look at the forum code to see to what extent certain classifications can be reserved for admins/moderators.

Best regards, Rainer.