Regeneration nach km | Posts 16+

I had made a suggestion because there might be something to your observations.
You are unfortunately showing screenshots taken with a different tool of unknown quality. That means comparing apples to oranges.
Furthermore, your Olasche value of 37,000 km is quite high, especially considering your rare regeneration types. If I calculate, that would be 25.6 g at my current mileage, which is almost exactly what I have with a vehicle that regenerates twice as often.
I think we should end this discussion here.
hg
Herbert

...

For the sake of clarity:
Your 70g is calculated at 245,000 km.
My 70 g are calculated based on a distance of 253,000 km.


Furthermore, your Olasche value of 37,000 km is quite high for your rare regenerations.
This results in several comments immediately.
1) How do you come to the conclusion that my rare recoveries are the norm? This only occurs occasionally in my driving profile, and when it does, it's typically during long stretches on the highway.
2) In Your comment, you state that the amount of wood ash loaded is proportional to the number of rain events. This statement is FALSE!
3) Furthermore, the calculation model that outputs the Ölaschebeladung is apparently very slow.
Because in all the vehicles whose DPF values I have examined, the figure of 250,000 km always appears, which is the point at which the maximum ash content is reached.
Specifically, regarding my vehicle, I have found that the oil consumption rate remains constant regardless of the driving profile. This is true whether I am driving primarily short distances and off-road (with a regeneration cycle of 400 km) or whether I am primarily driving on the highway (with a regeneration cycle of 1,000 km or 750 km after 23R6).
That also makes sense, as the oxidizable soot from combustion is not the culprit in ash from oil.

Bullshit - and therefore, this is the end.
Herbert

Hello,

Guys, you're making me suffer.

1. Please refrain from being personal.
2. This is my forum, not one created by any app manufacturers. So, entweder Sie die Nutzungsbedingungen hier einhalten oder Sie gehen woanders hin.
3. There is neither an advertising platform for apps here, nor is VCDS suitable for use on the go. The HEX-NET has existed for ages, and with it, you can always check what's going on using your mobile phone.
4. The ash in the DPF mainly comes from the additives in the engine oil, and is therefore directly related to the oil consumption and engine oil. The fuel consumption or the number of regenerations play a less significant role.
5. 10,2g of ash mass for 37,000km is a plausible value, see: /viewtopic.php?t=25999

Quote:

...if regeneration is required due to distance, consumption, or time

Yes, it is 100%. Whether it is active in the corresponding engine control unit is a different question.
Furthermore, for a regeneration request, the DPF (Diesel Particulate Filter) loading is also relevant.

@TTaurus: If you have a new DPF, it's useful to measure the ash content or Reset the ash volume, as otherwise the model for the DPF loading in the engine control unit will no longer be correct.

Best regards, Rainer
PS: Persönliches und "Werbung/Diffamierung" lösche ich aus dem Thema, es hat hier nichts zu suchen.
Furthermore, I'm wondering why Matt (who isn't a customer) has been on this forum for 11 years, given how bad it is here.
Even a long time ago, you have already proven that you are not really suitable for constructive discussions, even though you are right about the topic of Russ/Ash/DPF. Unfortunately, despite 11 years, nothing has changed in your behavior, which is why I wish you all the best elsewhere now.