Suche jemanden d.s.m. TDI 1,9 ankucken kann! -> Werkstätt | Posts 16+

Oops , it has almost 218,000 km, and yes, the jerking occurs at low speeds (when cold). For example, if I want to maintain a constant speed, it starts to jerk. Actually, it only doesn't jerk when I have full throttle!

[Translating...]

WarLord wrote:

Naja, bei untertouriger Fahrweise wird wohl jeder Motor ruckeln. Du meintest eher niedertourig.

Hi WarLord,

ok ist Definitionssache Wenn "untertourig" bedeutet, dass die aktuelle Drehzahl unter der Leerlaufdrehzahl ist, dann hast Du recht. Ich dachte immer, dass untertourig und niedertourig dassselbe bedeuten und damit der Drehzahlbereich zwischen Leerlaufdrehzahl und ca. 1500 rpm gemeint ist Naja wieder was gelernt

@Matthias:

herzliches Beileid: klingt sehr nach Einspritzpumpe (scheiß teuer ). Benutze aber nochmal die Suchfunktion und schaue nach Luftmassenmesser. Kann mich dumpf an einen Fall im Forum erinnern, bei dem ein defekter LMM zu Ruckelproblemen geführt hat . Mir fällt nochwas ein: schau mal hier http://www.geocities.com/ublatz/TDI-Probleme.htm oder hier https://community.dieselschrauber.org/en/viewtopic.php?t=658&highlight=diyruckelabhilfe

Hi,

Before I proceed with implementing a map feature with markers for partner workshops and a search function based on distance, I would appreciate any feedback you may have.
If you run a car repair shop, whether brand-specific or not, simply send a short email to the following address:

workshop directory: dieselschrauber.de
The data from the accumulated emails will be treated confidentially and is only used to estimate how I should proceed (or whether I will do nothing at all due to a lack of interest).

So, please email frequently .

Best regards, Rainer.

In my opinion, this would prevent workshops from cheating because any inconsistencies in feedback related to specific IDs would be noticeable.


I suppose the workshops that voluntarily participate won't have any problems with it.

Do even sloppy workshops have such good self-confidence that they would voluntarily agree to a public comparison?

The only option would be to make the whole thing 'semi-official.' The question is whether it's legally permissible to express your dissatisfaction by including the workshop's name and address.
A mere statement of facts is not defamation.

CU Gremlin.

Quote:

The only option would be to make the whole thing "semi-official." The question is whether it's legally permissible to express your dissatisfaction by including the workshop's name and address. A mere statement of facts is not defamation.

If the workshop decides to exclude a review, they could implement a "flagged review" counter and choose not to publish the review.
For every review that is not published, you automatically receive a grade of 6.
Published reviews are graded with scores from 1 to 4.

The system would display an average rating for each workshop if there are at least 'x' reviews and the average is greater than 4.
Workshops with an average score of less than 4 will be automatically excluded.
Teams with an average rating of 1-4 can withdraw at any time (for example, if their best player has broken both arms) and rejoin later (provided their average rating is above 4). During the period a team is withdrawn, their ratings will not be counted.

Best regards, Rainer.