bastion wrote: |
| No, they are two different systems. Firstly, the injection pressures are different (max 1000 bar VP/ =>1600 bar at CR), and also the materials are different. From the geometry and construction alone, |
Installation angle and aperture size, as well as focal length, etc., I initially consider to be negligible factors, as there are plenty of options.
I am also aware of the issue with the carbon buildup at the CR nozzle, perhaps that is also the cause of the wear.
I have a few Bosch part numbers for 4-valve engines, maybe someone can use them.
"DLSA 144 P 890 / UT" must have been manufactured somewhere in Germany, according to the label.
As I mentioned, I am primarily interested in whether there are any demonstrably different or similar aspects that can be defined. The fact that the wheel is constantly being reinvented is something that manufacturers mention repeatedly, so I don't pay attention to various press reports on that.
It's frustrating, and above all, questionable whether a similar problem will occur as frequently as some believe, and whether there will be a market for it in the foreseeable future?
Peugeot 307 (T5)1450kg Speck, RHS, MJ2002, 138g CO2 inkl. Korken im Auspuff und goldene Möhre 2006, MAF+50% mit passender Dieselmasse. nunmehr 370000km