Increased fuel consumption after MFA following AGR decommissioning

Hello everyone,

I'm confused again .
Nachdem ich nun mein AGR Ventil behandelt bzw. einen Fremdkörper zwischen Ansaugbrücke und AGR Ventil eingebracht habe verwirrt mich die Verbrauchsanzeige der MFA. Trotz gleicher Fahrweise wie vorher, zeigt mir die MFA einen erheblich höheren Verbrauch (0,6L), als vorher an. Kann das mit dem Stilllegen der AGR zu tun haben und wenn ja warum wird die Anzeige so deutlich beeinflusst? I haven't been able to determine whether the consumption has actually increased yet, as I haven't refilled it.

Greetings.
Reuselkopp.

Is the increased consumption real, or is it just a display or calculation error in the MFA (multifunction display)?

Without the AGR (Exhaust Gas Recirculation) system, the warm-up phase is naturally longer. Given your driving style and the distances you typically travel, could the warm-up phase have become so extended that your trips aren't long enough to allow the engine to reach its operating temperature? 0.6 liters sounds suspicious in that regard.

Hi,

As I mentioned before, I can't say for sure if there's a real increase in fuel consumption because I haven't refueled yet. If it's a calculation error, I wonder where it's coming from? My driving route hasn't changed. The commute to and from work is 50 km, which is 10 km of country road and then 40 km of highway. The return trip is the same route in reverse.

Regards,
Reuselkopp.

With this kind of weather, I don't think the warm-up phase is as important as it is in the winter...

calculate the actual consumption