Suche jemanden d.s.m. TDI 1,9 ankucken kann! -> Werkstätt | Posts 16+

Oops , it has almost 218,000 km, and yes, the jerking occurs at low speeds (when cold). For example, if I want to maintain a constant speed, it starts to jerk, but it actually only doesn't jerk when I'm giving it full throttle!

WarLord wrote:

Well, every engine will probably jerk if driven at too low an RPM. You probably meant low RPM.

Hi WarLord,

Okay, it's a matter of definition . If "undertuned" means that the current RPM is below the idle speed, then you are right. I always thought that "undertuned" and "low-revved" mean the same thing, and therefore refer to the RPM range between the idle speed and approximately 1500 rpm . Well, I learned something new .

@Matthias:

"My sincere condolences: it sounds very much like an injection pump (which is very expensive ). But please use the search function again and look for the mass airflow sensor. I vaguely remember a case in the forum where a faulty MAF sensor caused jerking problems . I also remember something else: take a look here http://www.geocities.com/ublatz/TDI-Probleme.htm or here https://community.dieselschrauber.org/en/viewtopic.php?t=658&highlight=diyruckelabhilfe."

Hi,

Before I proceed with implementing a map feature with markers for partner workshops and a distance-based search function, I would appreciate any feedback.
If you run a car repair shop, whether it's a brand-specific shop or not, simply send a short email to the following address:

workshop [email protected]
The data from the accumulated emails will be treated confidentially and is only used to estimate how I will proceed (or, if there is a lack of interest, whether I will do nothing at all).

So, please email frequently .

Best regards, Rainer.

In my opinion, this would prevent workshops from cheating, because any inconsistencies in feedback related to IDs would be noticeable.


I suppose the workshops that participate voluntarily don't have any problems with it.

Do even sloppy workshops have such good self-confidence that they would voluntarily agree to be publicly compared?

The only option would be to make the whole thing 'semi-official.' The question is whether it's legally permissible to express your dissatisfaction by publicly mentioning the workshop's name and address.
A mere statement of facts is not defamation.

CU Gremlin.

Quote:

The only option would be to make the whole thing "semi-official." The question is whether it is legally permissible to express one's displeasure by mentioning the workshop's name and address. A pure statement of facts is not defamation.

If the workshop decides to exclude a review, they could implement a "flagging" system and choose not to publish the review.
For every review that is not published, you automatically receive a grade of 6.
Published reviews are graded with scores from 1 to 4.

The system would display an average rating for each workshop, provided that there are at least x reviews and the average is greater than 4.
Workshops with an average score of 4 or less are automatically excluded.
Teams with an average rating of 1-4 can withdraw at any time (e.g., because their best player has broken both arms) and can re-enter later (provided their average rating is above 4). During the time a team is withdrawn, their ratings will not be counted.

Best regards, Rainer.