Hi.
@eike
My multimeter shows 0.1 ohms when the probes are shorted together, and 0.4 ohms between the "small" terminal on the starter and ground. This indicates approximately 0.3 ohms for the starter.
"Additionally, I briefly connected a 3.9 Ohm high-resistance resistor from the battery positive terminal to the starter motor. I measured approximately 920 mV between terminal 50 and ground, which, with a battery voltage of 12.6 volts, also suggests an input resistance of around 0.3 Ohms for terminal 50."
Quote: |
| It's the case that the magnetic switch on the starter motor switches the high current of the starter (in my Golf 2 GTD, I once measured around 80 amps). To switch this current, it would never need 12 volts x 40 amps = 480 watts. Roughly speaking, I would estimate that the magnetic switch needs a maximum of 5-10 amps (corresponding to 1-2 ohms). |
However, he also has to simultaneously push the starter pinion gear into the crankshaft sprocket, which requires quite a bit of force.
Quote: |
| Could it be that the magnetic switch doesn't work against ground, but against positive voltage? I also had a similar strange horn circuit in my GTD. |
I don't think so: if the magnetic switch receives power from the ignition switch's positive terminal and its other winding end is connected, for example, to a constant positive terminal, how can there be any current flow to activate the "main switch"?
Quote: |
But let's talk about something else. Why do you turn off the engine on downhill sections? Doesn't it already have a fuel cutoff in "glide" mode to increase the braking effect of the engine?
In addition, I suspect that the increased starter motor and battery wear |
would offset the potential savings

achieved through engine shutdowns
Quote: |
.
Schubabschaltung ja, aber ich will das Auto möglichst weit (aus)rollen lassen. Meine täglichen Gefällstrecken enden teilweise fast flach in Dörfern, und da kann ich im Getriebeleerlauf prima bis zum 1. KreIsel ranrollen.
With the gear engaged, the engine would slow the car down much earlier, so that I would have to use engine power again for the last part of the journey |
.
Anlasser und Batterie haben übrigens nicht viel mehr Streß, denn ich lasse den Motor meist wieder im 5. Groll up.
And I'm happy to forgo the engine braking effect, preferring to keep my brakes "in practice" instead.
Before I realized it, the brake discs rusted away faster than the brake pads wore out.
@gremlin:
}You shouldn't factor in the 0.3 ohms either. The magnetic switch represents an inductance that initially slows down the current increase. I'll try to find a measuring device and then record the current with the oscilloscope. }
I measured the inductance at approximately 460 µH, which, combined with 0.3 Ohms, results in a time constant of around 1.5 milliseconds... so there's not a significant delay.
I already understand that the current is zero at the very first instant.
However, the thought about the headlight bulbs has calmed me down a bit. A H4 filament has a resistance of approximately 0.3 ohms when cold, which means the inrush current for two bulbs is theoretically 80 amps.
In practice, the power is even switched on via the ignition switch. For example, if you start the engine with the low beam headlights on, the X-contact receives power again via the ignition switch after the engine starts.
However, the filaments probably won't be completely cool yet, so they will likely start with a lower amperage.
And a few µH of inductance are also present in the wiring between the battery and the headlights, which should help to reduce the inrush current peak.