Ladedruck/Einspritzmenge reduzieren? | Posts 16+

01-11-2006, 9:50 Subject:

Sure, here's the translation:

"Just briefly."
If someone cannot hear, they must feel!

I have a great tune, with 0.216 injectors, producing 130 horsepower and 270 Nm of torque. There's no hesitation and no excessive knocking.
Runs great.
So, 0.232 injectors are really too large;

will the pump pressure be sufficient to provide enough atomization at idle?

Sincerely, }

Guest Free account, no CAN development support

Hi, so it is, I also have a boost now, it's running great and going really fast!

'I'm just saying, the person who did the tuning has a dyno with 227 horsepower. They'll do a performance test sometime in the coming weeks, when they have time. They have access to a dyno, but we're not sure when it will be available yet.'

'I'm getting new injector seals tomorrow and I'm going to perfect my work. Also, I'm experiencing slight fluctuations in boost pressure because the LDA control valve sometimes gets stuck, so I'm getting a new one of those too!'

Oh, and one more thing, he examined the expensive device and determined that it uses a 1.5 bar sensor!

01-11-2006, 21:56 Subject:

Quote:

Oh, and one more thing, he examined the expensive device and determined that it has a 1.5 bar sensor installed!

Oh, so he only realized this now? Why didn't it go into limp mode with the 1.3 bar? Man, what a mess... I'd say someone is just fiddling around helplessly and looking for tips on what they're doing wrong...

Quote:

afn with 227 test stands ps

No comment... How well it runs is another matter. A few days ago, I spoke to an acquaintance from Austria who was trying to fix up a somewhat dilapidated racing car.
It also had the power.

However, the thing was still not usable.

Best regards, Rainer.

02-11-2006, 11:38 Subject:

Quote:

I was already resistant to advice back then, which is why I eventually kept my mouth shut and he got his desired nozzles into his nozzle holders. He explicitly did not want any adjustments to the STG (throttle body).

Now he's calling me, saying his car is only running at 1200 rpm, and basically, he's implying that it's my fault...

@Rainer:

Warum baust Du ihm das Zeug dann ein, wenn der gesunde Verstand schon "Nein, das geht in die Hose!" sagt? Selbst mit einer Stg-Anpassung ist es riskant diesem Menschenschlag was zu verkaufen. Der Karren hätte nur Vollgas gesehen und nach 4 Wochen hätte der Lader eh' die Welle ausgekotzt. Wer wäre also schuld trotz Steuergeräteanpassung? Na Sure, it's you again!
A close friend of mine has been dealing with lawyers forwarding each other's correspondence for the past six months because a client is complaining about something, where the client is actually at fault, and is now trying to squeeze money out of the situation. The client even had a bad feeling about it from the beginning. Now, if he encounters this "clientele resistant to advice" again (which you can't always avoid), he's going to stop working with them. The damage is ten times greater than the potential gain.
Well, if only we could always know that in advance...

Best regards!

02-11-2006, 16:31 Subject:

Hey, by the way, I've got another one of those 0.232 requests again. It might just be a prank, I'm not sure.

02-11-2006, 23:29 Subject:

It's a shame that there are such idiots, sorry for the word choice!

Tuning without brains or common sense.
It's best to put it in writing that they are waiving all liability.

Best regards,

03-11-2006, 0:47 Subject:

Quote:

It's best to put it in writing that they are waiving all forms of liability.

Code:

Jo,wie beim Fallschrimspringen aus der Pilatus Porter PC 6 750 Ps Turbine 11 min 4000Meter ! Muss ich sogar VOR der anmeldung des Clubs unterschreiben!