I have experience with Golf models 2, 3, and 4 (in the form of a Leon).
The latter two are both equipped with wide tires and a sports suspension.
What I experienced always depended almost entirely on the condition of the shocks and the tire width/aspect ratio (summer vs. winter tires).
and of course, with the adaptation to the corresponding conditions. Vehicle.
The heavy Leon feels most stable (subjectively), but only in city traffic and on highway entrances. Above 220 km/h on the highway and on faster, winding country roads, I get scared. (It wobbles and sways, it's too heavy for the forces acting on it). It also feels the most 'nose-heavy,' but there's a wide range of sensitivity.
The lighter Golf 3 wasn't quite as 'plumb' in tight city streets and on highway on-ramps, but with higher performance upgrades (VR6 stabilizers and suspension) and a higher top speed, it felt the most confident overall.
It didn't feel as nose-heavy, but it did happen that I ended up facing the opposite direction (180 degrees) after exiting the curve (90 degrees) due to the wet road surface. A narrow border area.
The lightest Golf 2 was, in every respect, the benchmark

(was it the first 'love at first sight' effect?)(The materials, the overall feel, the awesome 1.6L TD engine, the driving experience, the robustness... oh, it was amazing).
'With its 165 horsepower, it probably wasn't designed for a 'handling course,' but it was in excellent condition regarding its performance and feedback (maximum speed with full load, country roads), and it also had a wide operating range.'
Conclusion:
I'm not going to sign off on this issue of inadequate feedback from modern cars!
Sometimes the performance range is higher or lower, tighter or wider, but I always get a new feel for it with each car!
These ABC-(ESP) - XYZ) things already offer a berserker-like, dangerously all-powerful feeling when driving in the wet, old city streets

.