TDI Catalytic Converter Replacement

hello

I've now heard twice that people are removing the catalytic converter on TDI vehicles.

Now, I'd like to know if this actually achieves anything, and if so, what exactly does it accomplish?

I theoretically have the possibility of testing this with a second system from Schlachter.

I have no idea what to expect from this.

I'm curious to see.

best regards, uwe

roorback wrote:

Now, I would like to know if and what benefits this actually brings?

It depends on what you mean.

Regarding performance: nothing.

Regarding the volume: a little louder.

Regarding the operating license: it expires .

Thank you for the answer.

Not that I'm going to start messing around with "DIY tuning in muddy garages" – I certainly don't intend to do something like that, especially if it's pointless.
I was actually hoping for a solution to my question that explains something similar to the situation with the AGR (Abgasrückführung) system – which, while not improving performance, has problematic operational aspects but makes technical sense...

I've also heard about that, apparently a cat could get stained or something.

Okay, so why do people do things like that?

I once knew someone who modified his car's catalytic converter himself and claimed it gave him 10% more power with a 2.0-liter 16-valve gasoline engine, which might have been true. But what about with a TDI (diesel) engine?

Sure, here is the translation of the text from German to English:

"Hello"

Das entfernen des Kats bringt nie was. Besides:

-The cat is simply too small for the engine (which is rare).
- The catalytic converter is either clogged or otherwise defective, causing insufficient exhaust flow.

If the latter is the case, it results in a "performance increase," although it's not really something that can be called an increase. It's more of a restoration of the original factory performance.


If you really want to know my honest opinion:

Get rid of that thing; it's just as much junk as the EGR. And if it's no longer there, it can't break down anymore. } It doesn't provide any performance, but at least it gives you a good conscience (of course, not from an environmental perspective). }

My opinion: removing parts only causes trouble, doesn't improve performance, and leads to modifications that need to be addressed during the next vehicle inspection.
Let them in!
I am providing only legally sound recommendations, to the best of my knowledge.
Opinions are divided regarding the DPF, and there may be some disadvantages associated with it.

It seems like this is one of those topics where "you ask 10 people, and you get 10 different opinions." You've already heard two different perspectives. Now, it's time for you to form your own opinion. You've certainly received enough technical information.

If it's not causing any problems, leave it as it is.
The next time a retrofit DPF needs to be replaced, it will have to be replaced anyway.
If the TÜV inspector taps on the catalytic converter and it's defective, he'll hear it even if it's empty. It really just depends on whether the car as a whole attracts attention.
"I've been driving with a disconnected AGR hose for years and have always passed the technical inspection without any issues. This is because no one expects anything to be wrong with the car. They also have no interest in failing me, as the car is obviously well-maintained and doesn't have any cheap modifications. Even if the inspector notices the chip and extended gearbox during the test drive, they would never penalize me for it, because they can see that the car drives well in its current configuration."
I've found that people tend to pay closer attention when measures are technically nonsensical or overly conspicuous.

Hello,

Take a look here: /viewtopic.php?t=7048

This is a technical article.



Best regards,
Wool.

"Thank you."